http://911bloggerfraud.blogspot.com/2013/11/911blogger-mods-and-kawika-dig-hole.html
Whether or not Kawika is Cole or Larry, what's not in dispute is his long association with Phil Jayhan and his "Let's Roll" forum. Protests in comments aside, "Kawika" did contribute actively to both websites, at the same time, for at least a couple of years.
But he avoided promoting obvious links to 911blogger/Richard Gage, etc. Leaving the casual observer to assume 911blogger.com and Letsrollforums.com had no common ground. One is painfully trying to appeal to the reasonable mainstream; the other is in cuckoo woo land.
But Rethink911.org, a project with 911blogger owner Justin Keogh's involvement via AE911Truth, was promoted at Lets Roll:
http://letsrollforums.com/well-its-time-year-t30204.html?p=254302
Well its that time of the year again.
11 Sep 2013 , 02:04 AM
#1
ThinkerJoin Date: 18 Dec 2011Location: south walesPosts: 177Threads: 42
Well its that time of the year again.
As the title say its that time of the year again, such a sad day any of you guys on here got anything planned for today? i know there is allot going on in new york today. if you are in new york today have a look at this http://rethink911.org/news/rethink91...3/#pagecontent
Hope you all have a good day today.
thanks fireblade.
With approval of some mods, and no comment from the site owner:
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to fireblade911 For This Useful Post:
Previously, Lets Roll users had a less flattering perspective, accusing the 911Blogger website of being possibly "infiltrated:
http://letsrollforums.com/rock-creek-free-press-t23500.html
Full tin foil paranoia, approved of by the webmaster:Rock Creek Free Press: Is 911Blogger.com working for the other side?
Re: Rock Creek Free Press: Is 911Blogger.com working for the other side?
Oops should have referenced with links...
This article is from the November issue of the ROCK CREEK FREE PRESS
http://www.rockcreekfreepress.com/CreekV4No11-Web.pdf
They obviously don't believe agents are infiltrating, because they link to the website a month later, with no protest from users:
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BlatantWorld For This Useful Post:
http://letsrollforums.com/911blogger-dump-trucks-ready-t23886.html
911Blogger; Dump Trucks Ready on 9/11/01 to Cart off Evidence
This was a new video to me. Very telling...Visit link for full-story.
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-11-2...-cart-evidence
But the website has only nice things to say about AE911Truth and the scammer who runs it:
http://letsrollforums.com/richard-gage-aia-ae911truth-t22361.html
Richard Gage AIA from ae911truth Live Online Video Chat
Richard Gage will visit Paltalk video chat room entitled "The Truth Movement" on August 27, 2010 (6 to 8 p.m. EDT). We'll be taking questions from any room member who chooses to visit with us as time permits. We will conduct an open mic session after Richard's visit, as "The Truth Movement" paltalk room has very competent people on the subject of 9/11 from all over the world.
http://ae911truth.org/news/41-articl...-on-82710.html
Also If you would like to see a new investigation into 911 please sign the petition www.ae911truth.org Say yes to a new investigation. We hope that you find the room informative. Please feel free to ask any questions you may have.
Thank You Hope To See You.
Investigate 9/11
Approved of again by the webmaster:
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bel_Fla For This Useful Post:
And
17 Aug 2010 , 19:11 PM
AdminJoin Date: 23 Feb 2004Location: Middle EarthYou wouldn't happen to have Richards email address would you? I am searching for it but cannot find it in my box. I think I lost it.__________________
Thanks and thanks for the heads up on Gages Q&A session.
Cheers & welcome to the forums!
phil
Phil Jayhan 9/11 Blog | Phil Jayhan.Com Video Host | Frederick Bastiats Audio of "The Law"
Since 911blogger is an organ of AE911truth, it's odd that AE911Truth was never accused of being on the "other side". Or at the least, users aren't asking the question:
"Hey, wait a minute! Doesn't the Rethink911.org thing have a lot of involvement from the people who run 911blogger? Who we thought were working for 'the other side'? "
911blogger.com is equally oblivious about Let's Roll's website, saying little about the cuckoo woo land. It was linked to as recently as last september, with nary a user objection:
http://911blogger.com/news/2013-09-01/coast-coast-am-august-31-2013-other-911-suspects-c2cam-daily-john-b-wells
ENOUGH ALREADY! JET A DOES NOT EXPLODE
I heard Ryan's Coast to Coast AM interview.
He said that the Jet fuel exploded. No doubt there was an explosion but it was not Jet A.
Jet A does NOT explode at sea level unless heated.
There is 40 years of research data showing this. This includes 6 years of quality sampling data accumulated by NASA.
I have links and excerpts of data posted over on a forum board you might want to review for your own satisfaction that Jet A does not explode. In fact a 20 joule spark immersed in Jet A will not ignite it.
http://letsrollforums.com/review-flammability-hazard-jet-t28721.html
The photo taken by david handschuh , if real, shows an explosion from the side "the plane" enters on.
http://911anniversary.nydailynews.com/sites/default/files/impact.jpgindio007 on Sun, 09/22/2013 - 6:31pm.
But site co-owner Keogh did weigh in:
Deflagrate is the correct term.Whatever, Keogh. It's all a con. Why look here, where the mortal enemy of 911blogger.com is pushing the rethink911.org project Keogh is involved in:
Aerosolized hydrocarbons (which is what you get in a high speed jet crash) are easily ignited, and like many flammable aerosols will burn subsonically.
You can find examples of Jet A burning rapidly in a variety of aircraft crash footage. It's usually ignited by the engine, but in a high speed crashes there are plenty of other opportunities.
Two low speed examples:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrbt7t1UaPs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0O18pQUzS8
"In fact a 20 joule spark immersed in Jet A will not ignite it."
There is no oxygen if you immerse an ignition source. Not surprising.
From the linked thread...
"For the fuel to explode you would need a containment vessel."
Fuel requires oxygen to burn (as already noted, it does not explode). In a pulse detonation engine, you might call that an explosion, but obviously that's near stoichiometric mixing and not STP.
Fuel air mixtures are infamious for _not_ needing a containment vessle to deflagrate.
"If real"? Use evidence. We have 50+ angles of that crash on video, many which show the impact face.
http://911encyclopedia.com/wiki/index.php/World_Trade_Center_Jet_Impactsjkeogh on Sun, 09/22/2013 - 8:13pm.
http://rethinkae911truth.blogspot.com/2013/07/911blogger-arch-nemisis-wtcdemo-plugs.html
All a bit cozy, eh?
No comments:
Post a Comment